92/100 for me (hell, us)
Bottom line: For those who want Chateauneuf at a reduced price, STRONGLY recommended.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
2004 Domaine de Cassan Gigondas
Labels:
2004 vintage,
balanced.,
blackberries,
Cassan,
Gigondas,
licorice,
long finish
Sunday, May 23, 2010
2006 Baronia del Montsant (Flor d'Englora)
87/100 - a nicely balanced wine, with exactly what you expect in a good, young, Montsant
Bottom line: Try it if you want a cheaper, purer expression of the region.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Triple threat post
So last night (May 12), I brought three bottles from the cellar out to Jake & Telly's Taverna (see the post below if this sounds like deja bu). They were: 2000 Ceretto Zonchera Barolo, a 2003 Alto Moncayo (Garnacho) from Campo de Borja, and a 2004 St Cosme Gigondas. All were quite good, but the nod probably goes to the Gigondas.
2000 Ceretto (Zonchera) Barolo: Knock-out density and stuffing, and built for long haul. Tell-tale roses dipped in raspberry, and some spice on the nose as well. Great acidity, though it needed time in the decanter to lose some of its alcohol.
2003 Alto Moncayo: This one was for Christina, a fan of Grenache, and it was one heady mofo. Campo de Borja is a small appellation, poorly known by most, in NE Spain and is producing better wine year after year. The comment I would have said in smaller company would have been: "I think we just found the Ru Paul of the evening." It was monstrous on the nose, wine on nitro essentially, with rich dripping fruit but a little "sketchy" in the end. The palate was also full-on attack, but there was an issue with balance on this. At 16% ABV, it was close to being Port, and I think it was a lack of balancing acidity here. Telly thought it unbalanced.
2004 St Cosme Gigondas: This for me was the wine of the three - right at peak for both stuffing (still great plum, fig, and cocoa notes on this) and for the balance that 5+ years in bottle had given it. No issue with structure or acidity here: wonderful wine. Like wandering blind through liquid dark fruits only to find a chocolate center to it. Also, the cheapest of the three wines we had. Photo incoming...
2000 Ceretto (Zonchera) Barolo: Knock-out density and stuffing, and built for long haul. Tell-tale roses dipped in raspberry, and some spice on the nose as well. Great acidity, though it needed time in the decanter to lose some of its alcohol.
2003 Alto Moncayo: This one was for Christina, a fan of Grenache, and it was one heady mofo. Campo de Borja is a small appellation, poorly known by most, in NE Spain and is producing better wine year after year. The comment I would have said in smaller company would have been: "I think we just found the Ru Paul of the evening." It was monstrous on the nose, wine on nitro essentially, with rich dripping fruit but a little "sketchy" in the end. The palate was also full-on attack, but there was an issue with balance on this. At 16% ABV, it was close to being Port, and I think it was a lack of balancing acidity here. Telly thought it unbalanced.
2004 St Cosme Gigondas: This for me was the wine of the three - right at peak for both stuffing (still great plum, fig, and cocoa notes on this) and for the balance that 5+ years in bottle had given it. No issue with structure or acidity here: wonderful wine. Like wandering blind through liquid dark fruits only to find a chocolate center to it. Also, the cheapest of the three wines we had. Photo incoming...
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
2005 Husar de Tarczar, Marzemino (d'Isera)
This poorly-known varietal, Marzemino, can stand-in as a Chianti for some drinkers. There are differences, of course, but this 2005 Husar de Tarczar is grown on a 17ha vineyard in the town of Marano d'Isera. The Appellation is "Marzemino d'Isera" and is found near Trentino (NE Italy). The alcohol is under check at 13.0% ABV. So let's start with some similarities first (to Chianti): good acidity, great with pastas and red sauce. Night 1 with gnocchi in a simple garlic-basil-cured meat red sauce was a fantastic match. It also has about the same color as a good Chianti. What's different? As opposed to the tomato-on-the-grapevine smell that, to me, is a dead give-away for Chianti, this one is more like plums on the grapevine. There's also a definite funk (in a good way) on day 1, that should interest terroir-ists and those inclined to lighter, earthier reds like Pinot. You can find other tasting impressions here.
On day 2, that plumminess really shines through, still with strong acidity, and will go well with the baked chicken/potatoes, mushroom and quartered tomatoes cooking right now. In its favor: the aroma, some bitter chocolate with your plum, madam? Yes, please. Against it, there's a strange diluted 'clipped' aspect to this wine on the mid-palate, but I would guess this is also the nature of its low pH (high acidity) that fools you into thinking so.
Scared? You shouldn't be, go ahead - try it with any red sauce pasta dish. Or a nice slide of real parmesan (reggiano, of course). Still don't like it? I apologize. Love it? You're welcome.
88/100 - not a "great" wine, but interesting to come back to and certainly good enough to try other Marzeminos.
Bottom line: If you can find it, try it out, you may just find your designated hitter when you run out of Chianti or you're just bored with Chianti.
On day 2, that plumminess really shines through, still with strong acidity, and will go well with the baked chicken/potatoes, mushroom and quartered tomatoes cooking right now. In its favor: the aroma, some bitter chocolate with your plum, madam? Yes, please. Against it, there's a strange diluted 'clipped' aspect to this wine on the mid-palate, but I would guess this is also the nature of its low pH (high acidity) that fools you into thinking so.
Scared? You shouldn't be, go ahead - try it with any red sauce pasta dish. Or a nice slide of real parmesan (reggiano, of course). Still don't like it? I apologize. Love it? You're welcome.
88/100 - not a "great" wine, but interesting to come back to and certainly good enough to try other Marzeminos.
Bottom line: If you can find it, try it out, you may just find your designated hitter when you run out of Chianti or you're just bored with Chianti.
Labels:
great acidity,
great with food,
Husar,
Italy,
Marzemino,
plum,
small producer,
Trento region
Monday, May 10, 2010
1997 Heitz Cellar Cabernet Sauvignon (Napa), Trailside Vineyard
Steel yourself, random reader. This was one of the best, if not the best, California Cabernet I've ever had the pleasure of owning, opening, and drinking. The only bummer was finishing my last bottle from this 1997 vintage. For me it was the wine of the night on May 7, 2010, and it's on your far right in this picture. Right from the start, we knew we were in for a treat, as we enjoyed this at Jake and Telly's Taverna (Greek Restaurant) in Old Colorado City. The cork was pristine, the color gorgeous - dark ruby red, betraying almost none of this 13 years of age.
The aroma? Think of blackberry cobbler tempered with some summer herbs, a sliver of vanilla, and the backdrop of cedar lilting on the wind. This wine screams of California, and then some. On the palate, more delicious abuse continues: The density and stuffing of this wine were spot on, no heat of alcohol, perfect balance, great acidity. Blackcurrant velvet fist is the best descriptor I could come up with, but a it's a friendly velvet. Mated to a portion of sliced lamb meat from our mixed mezze platter, and we were all in heaven. Finished clean, long, and endured for well over a minute in the mouth. Like watching an amazing lover walk slowly out the door....wait, OK, a bit much. I'll stop now.
97/100 -- If I get a better Cab in my life, it will have all been worth it.
Bottom line: If you ever see a 97 Heitz Trailside Cab, and you don't buy it, you're an idiot.
The aroma? Think of blackberry cobbler tempered with some summer herbs, a sliver of vanilla, and the backdrop of cedar lilting on the wind. This wine screams of California, and then some. On the palate, more delicious abuse continues: The density and stuffing of this wine were spot on, no heat of alcohol, perfect balance, great acidity. Blackcurrant velvet fist is the best descriptor I could come up with, but a it's a friendly velvet. Mated to a portion of sliced lamb meat from our mixed mezze platter, and we were all in heaven. Finished clean, long, and endured for well over a minute in the mouth. Like watching an amazing lover walk slowly out the door....wait, OK, a bit much. I'll stop now.
97/100 -- If I get a better Cab in my life, it will have all been worth it.
Bottom line: If you ever see a 97 Heitz Trailside Cab, and you don't buy it, you're an idiot.
2003 Alvaro Palacios Finca Dofi (Priorat)
Finca Dofí is a blend of Garnacha, Cabernet, Merlot, Syrah and Cariñena. We had this wine on May 9, 2010 (Mother's Day, yes) at the Blue Star on half-price bottle night. What a great wine; all the dense, rocky austerity one would hope for in a great Priorat, and from a notoriously hot year. While the wood was present (knock-knock), it wasn't overwhelming and helped balance some of the torrid black fruit, grilled herbs, and hot slate notes to this wine. There's a sanguine (bloody) iron streak in this wine that emerges late, so it could probably stand to be decanted, frankly. Our match? A simple hamburger with fries; great juice, and a good pairing.
90/100 for my nose and palate.Bottom line: Well worth the $60-70 you'll pay retail for this wine. We paid $65! Track it down if you like a dense but classic-style Priorat. Palacios knows what he's doing and it shows, even in this difficult (hot) vintage.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



